Skip to content
Quantum Delay Metric

Quantum

Loss and expense under UK contracts

Loss and expense is a specific contractual mechanism, not a universal name for money on a construction project. Using it loosely is a good way to make a claim look unfamiliar with its own contract.

Jurisdiction
England and Wales, JCT family
Law and editions as at
3 August 2026
Last reviewed
3 August 2026
Editorial status
Editorial draft, not yet independently reviewed

The structure

Contract text Under the JCT forms, time is earned through the Relevant Events and money through the Relevant Matters. They are different lists, and an event can appear on one and not the other. That single fact resolves most confusion about why an extension of time did not produce a payment.

The process

  1. The contractor notifies that regular progress is being or is likely to be affected, as soon as the effect becomes apparent.
  2. The contractor provides the information and particulars the contract requires, and updates them.
  3. The contract administrator ascertains the amount, on the material provided.
  4. The amount is added to the contract sum through the payment mechanism.

The 2016 and later editions tightened the notification and particulars requirements. Which edition applies, and how it has been amended, changes the process materially, so read the executed contract rather than a general description of the form.

Ascertainment is not estimation

Ascertainment means establishing the actual loss and expense from the records. A calculation built on rates, formulas or global figures is not ascertainment, and a contract administrator asked to ascertain from that material is entitled to say the information is insufficient.

Technical guidance The RICS guidance on ascertaining loss and expense published in 2015 is archived. Archived guidance can be useful historical context and must never be presented as current mandatory practice.

What it does not cover

Loss and expense is a contractual remedy operating within the contract. Claims for breach, and heads such as financing charges or loss of profit, may run on a different basis with different requirements, and mixing the two in a single schedule of loss makes both harder to follow.

Where the record comes in

Every mechanism on this page turns on evidence: what happened, what was known and when. A record built as the job happens is worth more than any argument assembled afterwards. Construction Metric keeps that record automatically, from the messages, photographs and voice notes a site team already sends.

Built by AI Metric

The analysis on this site is only as fast as the evidence behind it. AI Metric builds bespoke systems for consultancies, contractors and claims teams: document and correspondence triage, event registers assembled from the project record, programme and cost reconciliation, and drafting support that always cites the document it came from. Built for review by your own experts, never to replace their judgement.

Do not overread this page

This describes the general structure of the JCT mechanism. The edition, the amendments and the executed particulars control, and no clause wording is reproduced here.

General explanation of how contract mechanisms, analysis methods and legal principles generally work. It is not legal or contractual advice, not an opinion on any project, and no standard-form contract wording is reproduced anywhere on this site. Standard forms are routinely amended, so every default described here, including every time period, can be different on your project. Your executed contract, as amended, and the governing law and forum always control. Deadlines may already be running: if an event has occurred, preserve your position and take qualified advice.